民事答辯狀翻譯模板|民事答辯狀的格式和主要內(nèi)容|專業(yè)翻譯公司

在我國民事答辯狀包括首部、答辯理由和結(jié)尾三個(gè)部分：

1．  首部。

寫明下列事項(xiàng)：標(biāo)題寫“民事答辯狀”；答辯人的基本情況。 列答辯人姓名，性別，年齡，民族，籍貫，職業(yè)或職務(wù)，單位或住址；答辯事由。具體行文為：“因某某一案，提出答辯如下：”下面轉(zhuǎn)入正文。也可以這樣行文：“答辯人于某年某月某日收到某某人民法院交來原告因某某一案的起訴狀，現(xiàn)答辯如下。”

2．答辯理由

答辯狀的內(nèi)容沒有統(tǒng)一的規(guī)定，要根據(jù)原告的訴狀內(nèi)容來確定。除被告愿意承認(rèn)原告的訴訟請(qǐng)求外，答辯狀的理由部分要針對(duì)原告在訴狀中提出的事實(shí)和理由進(jìn)行答辯，并可提出相反的事實(shí)、證據(jù)和理由，證明自己的理由和觀點(diǎn)是正確的。

3. 寫完答辯理由后，另行寫“此致”，再另一行寫“某某人民法院”。由答辯人簽名蓋章，注明年月日。

答辯狀

ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

 

答辯人：××人民醫(yī)院

住址：××市××路七號(hào)

Respondent： ××× People’s Hospital

Address： No 7, ××Road, ×× City

因×××要求×××人民醫(yī)院人身損害賠償一案，現(xiàn)提出答辯意見如下：

The following answer is hereby given to the claim of ××× for compensation by the ××× People’s Hospital for personal injuries：

1．答辯人與×××之間不存在直接的合同關(guān)系，答辯人1998年6月10日與××第二建筑安裝工程公司訂立了一份口頭合同，由××第二建筑安裝工程公司負(fù)責(zé)把答辯人的一個(gè)高壓電表柜拆除，×××是受××第二建筑安裝工程公司的委托來拆除高壓電表柜的，與答辯人之間不存在直接合同關(guān)系。

1. The respondent does not have a direct contractual relationship with ×××. The respondent entered into an oral contract with ×× No 2 Construction and Installation Company on June 10, 1998, whereby ×× No 2 Construction and Installation Company shall be responsible for removing the high-voltage meter cabinet. ××× was engaged in removing the high-voltage meter cabinet as entrusted by ×× No 2 Construction and Installation Company and therefore has no direct contractual relationship with the respondent.

2．××的傷害賠償應(yīng)由××二建筑安裝工程公司負(fù)責(zé)，其一，根據(jù)我國法律和有關(guān)司法解釋規(guī)定，××第二建筑安裝工程公司對(duì)其職工在履行合同的范圍內(nèi)所受到傷害應(yīng)負(fù)責(zé)任，× ××的傷害并不是由于合同客體以外的事物造成的。其三，受××第二建筑安裝工程公司委 托的×××在拆除高壓電表柜的過程中，存在著嚴(yán)重違反操作程序的行為，未盡一個(gè)電工應(yīng)盡的注意。

2. The liabilities for compensating ×× for the damage shall be born by ×× No 2 Construction and Installation Company for the following reasons. Firstly, pursuant to PRC laws and relevant judicial interpretations, ×× No 2 Construction and Installation Company shall be liable for any injuries suffered by its employees to the extent of the contract performance. The injuries of ××× was not caused by anything other than the object of the contract. Thirdly, ×××, who was entrusted by ×× No 2 Construction and Installation Company, seriously violated the operational procedure in removing the high-voltage meter cabinet and failed to pay due attention thereto.

3．答辯人對(duì)×××傷害賠償不應(yīng)承擔(dān)責(zé)任。根據(jù)我國《民法通則》的規(guī)定，從事高度危險(xiǎn)作業(yè)的人致他人損害的，應(yīng)負(fù)賠償責(zé)任。而本案中答辯人與××第二建筑安裝工程公司訂有合同，高度危險(xiǎn)來源已通過合同合法地轉(zhuǎn)移給 ××第二建筑安裝工程公司?！痢恋诙ㄖ惭b工程公司成為該危險(xiǎn)作業(yè)物的主體，××在操作過程中受到傷害，這是××第二建筑安裝工程公司在履行合同過程中，合同客體造成自己?jiǎn)T工的傷害行為，與答辯人無關(guān)。

3. The respondent shall not be liable for compensating the injuries of ×××. In accordance with the General Principles of the Civil Law, any person engaged in highly dangerous operation shall be liable for compensation in the event of any damages. In this case, however, the respondent entered into a contract with ×× No 2 Construction and Installation Company, whereby the source of high danger shifted to ×× No 2 Construction and Installation Company legitimately. ×× No 2 Construction and Installation Company became the subject of the dangerous operation, and therefore any damages caused in the contract performance by ×× No 2 Construction and Installation Company has no connection with the respondent.

綜上所述，×××人民醫(yī)院為不適合被告，請(qǐng)貴院依法駁回原告起訴。

By reason of the foregoing, ××× People’s Hospital is not legible for becoming the defendant. We hereby request the court to reject the plaintiff’s action according to law.

此致

××市中級(jí)人民法院

To：

×× City Intermediate People’s Court

答辯人：×××人民醫(yī)院

Respondent： ××× People’s Court

日期：

Date：

英美國家民事答辯狀的格式和主要內(nèi)容與我國的民事答辯狀相似。

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT

科克縣巡回法院伊利諾縣分庭

 

INDEPENDENT TRUST CORP. Plaintiff, 原告 VS. LAURENCE W. CAPRIOTTI, et al., Defendants 被告

No. 00 CH08270 案件編號(hào)

ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 答辯狀

 

NOW COMES the Defendant, ___, by and through his attorney, ___, and for his Answer to the Complaint of the Plaintiff, states as follows:

被告**現(xiàn)到庭，通過其律師就原告的訴稱作出如下答辯：

1. The Defendant invokes his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination as to each and every allegation contained in Paragraphs 1 through 75 inclusive.

被告援引美國聯(lián)邦憲法第五修正案規(guī)定的“不自證其罪權(quán)”對(duì)抗原告在其起訴狀中第一至第七十五段所包含的每一種訴稱。

2. As to Count I, the Defendant makes no answer, as the allegation in Court I are not directed towards Defendant.

對(duì)于原告在起訴狀中的第一項(xiàng)案由，被告不做任何答辯，因?yàn)樵嫫鹪V狀中的第一項(xiàng)案由并未直接針對(duì)原告。

3. As to Count II, the Defendant invokes his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination as to each and every allegation contained in Court II.

被告援引美國聯(lián)邦憲法第五修正案規(guī)定的“不自證其罪權(quán)”對(duì)抗原告在其起訴狀中第二項(xiàng)案由所包含的每一種訴稱。

4. …

5. …

6. …

WHEREFORE, the Defendant prays that the Complaint of the Plaintiff be dismissed in its entirety and that no relief be afforded whatsoever thereunder.

由此，被告請(qǐng)求法院駁回原告的所有請(qǐng)求事項(xiàng)，不給予原告任何一種救濟(jì)。

Respectfully submitted, 此致

By ___ 原告簽名

Attorney for Defendant ___原告律師簽名